Knicks vs Pacers Match Player Stats
If you searched for knicks vs pacers match player stats, you probably do not want a lifeless box score with no explanation. You want to know who produced, where the game turned, and which numbers actually mattered. The latest completed meeting between these teams came on March 13, 2026, when the New York Knicks beat the Indiana Pacers 101-92 in Indianapolis. The headline numbers were clear: Jalen Brunson scored 29 with nine assists, OG Anunoby added 25 points, and Mitchell Robinson dominated the glass with 22 rebounds. That is the raw output. The more important part is what those numbers reveal about how New York controlled the game.
Knicks vs Pacers match player stats at a glance
The quickest way to understand this game is to look at the leaders. Brunson led all scorers with 29 points and paired that with nine assists. Anunoby finished with 25 points, eight rebounds, and five assists. Robinson posted 12 points and a career-high 22 rebounds, including nine offensive boards. For Indiana, Jarace Walker led the way with 18 points and nine rebounds, while Aaron Nesmith scored 12, Ivica Zubac had 11 points and eight boards, and T.J. McConnell gave the Pacers 10 points and six assists off the bench. The Knicks also moved ahead 2-1 in the season series after this win.
Full Knicks player stats breakdown
Jalen Brunson was the offensive control center. His final line was 29 points, nine assists, and five rebounds in a little under 37 minutes. He went 11-of-25 from the field and 7-of-8 from the line, which tells the story pretty well. He did not hit from deep, going 0-for-3 from three, but that hardly mattered because he kept getting New York organized, especially before halftime. Reuters noted that Brunson had 23 first-half points, which explains why the Knicks were able to build separation even before the game got messy in the second half. He was not just the leading scorer. He was the player who stabilized the game every time Indiana tried to flip the momentum.
OG Anunoby gave the Knicks the second star performance they needed. He finished with 25 points, eight rebounds, and five assists while shooting 8-of-16 overall, 2-of-4 from three, and 7-of-9 at the foul line. That is efficient scoring with real secondary playmaking, not empty volume. His role became even more important late, when the Knicks needed calm finishing rather than wild shot selection. Reuters reported that New York took firm control for good when it scored seven straight points and got a key Anunoby layup with 1:39 left. That fits the box score perfectly. His numbers were strong, but his timing was better than the totals alone suggest.
Mitchell Robinson owned the most important part of the floor. He scored 12 points, but the real damage came on the glass, where he posted a career-high 22 rebounds, including nine offensive rebounds. That is a game-changing number. New York did not shoot lights out, especially from three, so extra possessions mattered. Robinson created them over and over. He also added two steals and two blocks, which makes his stat line even more valuable because it was not just rebounding volume. It was total interior disruption. When a center gives you 22 rebounds in a 9-point road win, that is not a side note. That is one of the main reasons the other team never fully got over the hump.
The rest of the Knicks rotation did enough. Mikal Bridges scored 11 points on 4-of-9 shooting, Landry Shamet added 9 points with two made threes, and Jordan Clarkson chipped in 8 points off the bench. None of those lines scream takeover, but that is the point. New York did not need one more star explosion. It needed steady support around Brunson, Anunoby, and Robinson. Bridges also helped New York stretch its lead in the third before Indiana made its run, and Shamet’s second-quarter three was part of the sequence that pushed the Knicks into a stronger halftime position. The supporting cast was not spectacular, but it was functional, and functional was enough.
Full Pacers player stats breakdown
Indiana’s numbers look respectable in places, but they do not hold up under pressure. Jarace Walker led the Pacers with 18 points and nine rebounds, hitting 3-of-9 from deep. Aaron Nesmith scored 12 points, and Ivica Zubac added 11 points and eight rebounds. Andrew Nembhard had eight points and seven assists, which is decent as a table-setting line, but his shot-making was rough at 3-of-14 from the field. That mattered because Indiana needed efficient guard play to offset the Knicks’ rebounding edge, and it did not get it. Walker produced the best headline number for Indiana, but the Pacers still lacked a true offensive anchor in this game.
The Pacers got real energy from the bench, especially from T.J. McConnell. He finished with 10 points and six assists in just over 20 minutes and helped drive Indiana’s third-quarter push and early fourth-quarter pressure. Jay Huff and Obi Toppin each scored 9 points, and Huff’s back-to-back threes helped fuel the run that erased a 15-point deficit in the third. That part matters because the Pacers did not simply roll over. They fought back and tied the game at 71-71. The problem was finishing possessions on defense and matching New York’s closing shot creation late. Their bench gave them life, but it could not carry them over the line.
Team stats that decided Knicks vs Pacers
The team numbers explain the result better than any one highlight. The Knicks shot 42 percent from the field and only 28.6 percent from three, so this was not a shooting clinic. The Pacers were even worse, finishing at 39.3 percent overall and 26.3 percent from deep. That shooting gap was not massive, but New York paired it with a 53-46 rebounding advantage and a 16-11 edge in second-chance points. That is where the game tilted. When both teams are cold from outside, the team that wins the glass usually wins the night. New York did exactly that.
The Knicks also won the interior battle. Official scorer data shows New York outscored Indiana 46-38 in the paint. That is a clean signal that the Knicks were not living and dying by jump shots. They were getting to better areas, converting around the rim, and using Robinson’s rebounding to keep pressure on Indiana’s front line. The Pacers actually finished with one fewer turnover than New York, but that did not save them because the Knicks created more valuable possessions through offensive rebounding and paint touches. This is the kind of game where the box score says something simple: New York’s offense was not pretty, but it was harder to stop in the spots that mattered most.
Quarter-by-quarter game flow
New York set the tone early and won the first half without fully breaking the game open. The Knicks led 24-21 after the first quarter and 56-45 at halftime. Brunson was the main reason. Reuters reported he had 23 points by the break, and the Knicks used a late second-quarter sequence featuring Robinson and Shamet to stretch the lead to 11. Indiana did have a brief lead in the second quarter, but it never felt sustained. The Knicks were dictating the rhythm more often than not, even if the game still looked recoverable for the Pacers.
The third quarter nearly changed everything. New York pushed the lead to 15 points, but Indiana answered with an 18-5 run and tied the game at 71 on a McConnell jumper. That is the stretch a lazy recap will mention in one line and move on from, but it was the most important swing in the game. The Pacers got real momentum from Huff’s shot-making and McConnell’s pace, and for a moment it looked like New York had lost control. Instead, the Knicks regained enough balance to take a two-point lead into the fourth, which prevented Indiana’s rally from becoming a full collapse.
The fourth quarter was where New York showed the difference between hanging around and closing. The Knicks opened the period with five straight points, then survived another push when McConnell scored six straight for Indiana. But once the game tightened to 90-88, New York delivered the decisive blow: a 7-0 run that included Anunoby’s late layup and effectively ended the contest. That closing stretch is why Brunson’s control and Anunoby’s finishing matter more than just their final totals. When the game demanded clean possessions, the Knicks had players who could produce them. Indiana did not.
What the player stats really say about both teams
The Knicks won this game in a way that should encourage them. They did not need a hot three-point night. They did not need a monster bench explosion. They won through half-court organization, physical rebounding, and paint pressure. Brunson handled creation, Anunoby provided efficient secondary scoring, and Robinson swallowed up misses. That formula travels better than random perimeter shot-making, especially late in the season. The box score also shows New York doing this while missing key names from the inactive list, including Karl-Anthony Towns, which makes the win more credible rather than less.
Indiana’s problem was not effort. It was offensive ceiling and shot quality. The Pacers had some useful individual lines, but the overall profile was weak: poor shooting, fewer rebounds, fewer paint points, and no reliable top-end scorer in crunch time. Context matters here too. The official inactive list included Tyrese Haliburton and Pascal Siakam, which obviously hurts Indiana’s creation and scoring structure. Still, that is exactly why a stats article needs context. Numbers do not exist in a vacuum. The Pacers had moments, but their available group did not have enough creation or interior control to beat a tougher Knicks lineup.
Season-series update and what comes next
After this result, the Knicks held a 2-1 lead in the season series over the Pacers. ESPN’s matchup tracker on the box-score page also showed another meeting coming next, and the NBA schedule confirms the next Pacers-Knicks game is set for March 17, 2026, in New York. That matters because this article is not just a backward-looking recap. It gives a better read on what each team carried into the next meeting. New York came out of this game looking more balanced and more physical. Indiana came out of it looking short on top-end shot creation and vulnerable on the glass.
Final takeaway
The cleanest summary of the knicks vs pacers match player stats is this: New York won because its best players shaped the game in the most dependable areas. Brunson controlled scoring and tempo. Anunoby gave the Knicks efficient two-way production. Robinson crushed Indiana on the boards and turned misses into second chances. The Pacers got competitive lines from Walker and McConnell, but they did not win the possession battle, and they did not finish well enough offensively to survive that problem. This was not a flashy Knicks win. It was a disciplined one, and the numbers back that up
FAQs
Who scored the most points in the latest Knicks vs Pacers game?
Jalen Brunson led all scorers with 29 points for the Knicks.
Who had the most rebounds in Knicks vs Pacers?
Mitchell Robinson had the biggest rebounding night with 22 boards, including nine offensive rebounds.
What was the final score of Knicks vs Pacers on March 13, 2026?
The Knicks beat the Pacers 101-92 in Indianapolis.
Which team won the key team-stat battle?
New York controlled the glass 53-46 and also led 16-11 in second-chance points and 46-38 in points in the paint.
When do the Knicks and Pacers play again?
Their next scheduled meeting is March 17, 2026, in New York.
About the Author
